Empowering early career pharmacists: Unleashing non-clinical competencies through pharmacy residency.

INTRODUCTION: Pharmacy residency programs traditionally prioritize clinical skills development. However, non-clinical competencies, such as leadership, conducting education, and innovation, are now emerging as pivotal factors in propelling pharmacists toward excellence in practice. The extent to which these non-clinical skills are effectively fostered by residency programs remains unclear. This study aims to explore how residency programs propel the development of crucial non-clinical competencies such as leadership, conducting education, and innovation. METHODS: Pharmacists who completed a pharmacy residency program and their preceptors from a tertiary teaching hospital took part in semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis, employing an inductive approach and aided by NVivo software, was used to identify recurrent themes in the interview responses. RESULTS: Competency development was shaped by four key themes: system-dependent facilitators, system-dependent barriers, individual resident attitudes, and pharmacy department influences. The structure of the residency program was perceived to strongly support competency development in conducting education. The impact on the leadership and innovation competencies development was comparatively lesser. CONCLUSION: Pharmacy residency is perceived as effective in supporting non-clinical competency development when there is a clear structured framework with objectives and guidance for pre-defined activities and tasks known to support competency development. Ambiguity and a lack of standardized guidance in developing specific competencies were identified as factors that diminish their relevance for both residents and preceptors. To enhance residency programs, it is essential to establish clear frameworks, with pre-defined objectives and activities known to support competency development and supplement them with the necessary skills-building courses where appropriate.

A Systematic Review of Interventions Implemented by Pharmacy Programs to Improve Postgraduate Residency Placement.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to identify the impact of interventions implemented by pharmacy programs to support students pursuing postgraduate residency training. METHODS: We conducted a literature search through March 8, 2022 to identify articles that studied an intervention made by a pharmacy program aiming to prepare students to qualify for a postgraduate residency position. Data were collected to describe each study's methods, the included population, and outcomes and to evaluate study risk of bias. FINDINGS: Twelve studies met our inclusion criteria. The evidence base is limited to observational data with significant risk of bias. Pharmacy programs use various strategies to deliver training to students opting for the residency application process: elective courses, multiyear curricular tracks, introductory pharmacy practice experiences (IPPEs), and organized professional development events. Participation in these interventions was found to be associated with higher residency match rates, with exception of IPPE where match rates were not evaluated as an outcome. Curricular tracks and multicomponent professional development events were found to be associated with the largest improvement in match rates. Participation in electives or multicomponent professional development was found to be associated with improved student knowledge and confidence in interviews. Multicomponent professional development was also found to be associated with student preparedness for the match process. Curricular tracks and IPPE were found to be associated with improved student knowledge, whereas mock interviews were associated with improved student confidence. SUMMARY: Pharmacy schools support preparation of students for the residency application and interview process in a variety of ways. The current evidence does not support one strategy to be more effective than another. Until additional evidence emerges to guide decisions, schools should select training programs based on balancing the need to support student professional development with resources and workload.

Conducting Multicenter Residency Research.

PURPOSE: Conducting well designed pharmacy resident research projects has inherent challenges including inadequate sample size, a lack of time, decreased generalizability, and inadequate research support. A way to overcome these barriers is through conducting multicenter research projects. However, this approach may also bring new challenges. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to provide a general approach for pharmacy preceptors and leaders on implementation of multicenter residency research. SUMMARY: This article includes a general approach to conducting multicenter research from experienced individuals based upon their successes and failures. A timeline-based format is presented to lay the groundwork for implementation of this approach. Key topics in this paper include establishing a research overview committee, research question development, Institutional Review Board considerations, site recruitment, authorship discussions, resident coordination, protocol development, data collection, manuscript development, and considerations after residency. The approach maintains a critical focus on the individual residents ability to achieve American Society of Health-System Pharmacists accreditation standards for conducting research while operating in a collaborative manner. CONCLUSION: Conducting multicenter residency research projects requires a team-based approach and advanced planning. This approach has the potential to improve pharmacy resident project quality.

Affective domain predictors of PharmD student pursuit of and successful matching for postgraduate pharmacy residency training.

PURPOSE: A study was conducted to identify significant associations between affective domain (AD) features identified using the Birkman Method assessment and students' likelihood to pursue and to successfully match for postgraduate residency training (PGRT), while controlling for demographic and academic variables known to impact PGRT match rates. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 3 graduating classes of PharmD students from 2 colleges of pharmacy was performed. Data points such as PGRT match results, PGRT pursuit, student demographics, academic performance information, and AD data from the Birkman assessment were analyzed. Regression analysis was used to identify statistically significant associations between demographic, academic performance, and AD variables with both pursuit of PGRT and successful matching for PGRT. RESULTS: Data from 503 students were evaluated, with 211 (42%) pursuing PGRT. A variety of AD variables were significantly associated with pursuing PGRT and matching for PGRT. Two groups of actionable variables emerged: (1) variables associated with a lesser likelihood of pursuing PGRT but a greater likelihood of successful matching, and (2) variables associated with a greater likelihood of pursuing PGRT and a lesser likelihood of successful matching. CONCLUSION: Early identification of students' AD features along with specific interventions to promote PGRT pursuit in those less likely to pursue but more likely to match, as well as interventions to promote successful matching in students most likely to pursue but less likely to match for PGRT, is a strategy for possibly optimizing PharmD student career path planning and PGRT match success that merits further evaluation.

Evaluation of ß-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring among US health systems with postgraduate year 2 infectious diseases pharmacy residency programs.

PURPOSE: While some guidelines recognize the need for ß-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), there is still a paucity of data regarding the prevalence of and barriers to performing ß-lactam TDM in the United States. We sought to estimate the prevalence of ß-lactam TDM, describe monitoring practices, and identify actual and perceived barriers to implementation among health systems in the US. METHODS: A multicenter, cross-sectional, 40-item electronic survey was distributed to all postgraduate year 2 (PGY2) infectious diseases (ID) pharmacy residency program directors (RPDs) listed in the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists pharmacy residency directory. The primary outcome was the percentage of institutions with established ß-lactam TDM. Secondary outcomes included assessing ß-lactam TDM methods and identifying potential barriers to implementation. RESULTS: The survey was distributed to 126 PGY2 ID RPDs, with a response rate of 31.7% (40 of 126). Only 8% of respondents (3 of 39) performed ß-lactam TDM. Patient populations, therapeutic targets, and frequency and timing of obtaining repeat ß-lactam concentration measurements varied among institutions. The greatest barrier to implementation was lack of access to testing with a rapid turnaround time. Institutions were unlikely to implement ß-lactam TDM within the next year but were significantly more inclined to do so within 5 years (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: ß-lactam TDM was infrequently performed at the surveyed US health systems. Lack of access to serum concentration testing with rapid turnaround and lack of US-specific guidelines appear to be considerable barriers to implementing ß-lactam TDM. Among institutions that have implemented ß-lactam TDM, there is considerable variation in monitoring approaches.

Novel use of a sequential standardized oral board exam to assess PGY1 resident progression.

PURPOSE: A standardized oral board exam was created to longitudinally assess postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) pharmacy residents in key domains. SUMMARY: We provide a descriptive review of a novel oral board exam administered quarterly to our PGY1 pharmacy residents. Preceptors from our core rotations (internal medicine/infectious diseases, adult critical care, oncology, pediatrics, and administration/health policy and outcomes) developed questions based on situations commonly encountered by PGY1 residents to assess residents' communication; the content of their response, assessment, and plan; and coachability. Over the 4-year history of this assessment, scoring has matured to consider whether a resident has or has not met or has exceeded expectations for a PGY1 resident at a given stage in their training. Our comprehensive feedback and action planning approach included residents' self-assessment, feedback from the exam committee, development and implementation of a customized training plan for execution, and dissemination to our preceptors. Systematically assessing our PGY1 residents with this innovative method provided a process for tracking their performance and served as a baseline for those who completed additional training at our institution. CONCLUSION: A standardized quarterly oral board exam was developed to identify residents' strengths and areas for improvement at established periods during the PGY1 residency training program. This standardized assessment, paired with individualized action plans and open communication with key stakeholders, stimulated development in residents' performance, communication, and interpersonal skills. We aim to expand this system's application to identify predictors of success for candidates we interview for our postgraduate training programs.

Implementation of a novel learning experience in scientific writing, publishing, and peer review into a first year pharmacy practice residency.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacists with competency in writing, publishing, and peer review are essential to continue advancing the pharmacy profession, but structured training of these skills may vary. OBJECTIVE: The authors set out to implement and assess the impact of a structured learning experience into a postgraduate year 1 pharmacy residency training program that provides tangible experience in the processes of scientific writing, publishing, and peer reviewing. METHODS: A quarterly pharmacy newsletter process was augmented to include an editorial board that consisted of residency trained pharmacists with varying levels of experience in scientific writing, publishing, and peer reviewing. The process was designed to provide a structured writing learning experience, to reinforce important concepts and terminology, and to simulate the process of submitting a manuscript to a peer-reviewed publication. Impact of the learning experience on quality of article submissions was assessed by comparing first quarter and last quarter writing submission scores for residents between 2017 and 2020. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was observed in both raw scores (27 vs. 42.5 points out of 50 points possible, P < 0.05) and the proportion of pass or fail when comparing writing submission scores from the first quarter of the learning experience to submission scores from the last quarter (25% passing rate vs. 83% passing rate, P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: This novel learning experience was successfully integrated into a quarterly pharmacy newsletter and resulted in improved writing scores. This structured writing learning experience can be readily integrated into pharmacy residency training programs, and it provides hands-on training in scientific writing, publishing, and peer review for both residents and preceptors.

Coping with the residency program during COVID-19: Hematology oncology pharmacy residents' perspective.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to significant changes in all governmental activities in Saudi Arabia including training and teaching, with the majority of such activities suspended in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We aim to share the challenges that Hematology Oncology Pharmacy (HOP) residents faced during the quarantine period and provide recommendations on how to cope with the residency journey. METHOD: We followed a qualitative methodological approach in March 2020 using a structured virtual group discussion for data generation. RESULTS: All six PGY2 hematology oncology pharmacy (HOP) residents were included in the group discussion. The group agreed that the need for HOP services during this pandemic is beyond the scope of oncology pharmacists' normal daily practice. The group recognized two fundamental points. First, the goal of the current training should be customized to the most pressing need and recognized at the national level. Second, the current training system should be improved to ensure efficient use of current resources. On this basis, the group developed six main recommendations for action. CONCLUSION: The current situation is a challenge for all healthcare providers, and the majority of the nation's current generation never dealt with such a situation in days gone by. This paper presents the challenges that should be addressed at the national level and provide a fundamental consensus recommendation for practical approaches to maximize learning and minimize disruption to trainees' progression while maintaining patient-pharmacy quality of care.

Assessment of a Scholars Program Designed to Enhance Pharmacy Students' Competitiveness for Postgraduate Residency Training.

Objective. To assess pharmacy residency match/placement rates and student perceptions of a program designed to enhance Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) student competitiveness for postgraduate residency positions. Methods. The Scholars Program was developed to provide advanced training to select PharmD students who had an interest in postgraduate residency training and was completed during the third and fourth professional years. The program consisted of mentoring; elective coursework encompassing clinical practice, teaching, and leadership; modified experiential education; journal club meetings; teaching assistant duties; conducting research and/or scholarship; and delivering professional presentations. Residency match/placement rates of students who had completed the program were compared to national data and to students in the school who were not enrolled in the program. Perceptions of the program were assessed using an online survey. Results. Sixty-four students enrolled in and completed the Scholars Program from 2013 to 2019. Of these, 58 (91%) pursued postgraduate residency training. Students enrolled in the program had a higher combined phase 1/phase 2 match rate (91.4% vs 67.4%) than students in other PharmD programs across the United States. Similarly, students enrolled in the Scholars Program had a higher combined phase 1/phase 2 match rate (91.4% vs 62.9%) and overall residency placement rate (96.6% vs 67.0%) compared to students in the school who were not enrolled in the program. More than 85% of students enrolled in the Scholars Program who pursued residency training agreed that the program prepared them for and helped them attain a postgraduate residency. Conclusion. Pharmacy students enrolled in the Scholars Program experienced high residency match/placement rates and viewed the program as valuable preparation for postgraduate training.

Exploring pharmacy residency program director preference of pharmacy student organization membership and leadership involvement on residency candidate interview selection.

INTRODUCTION: Pharmacy student professional organization involvement and leadership are important qualifications of a pharmacy residency candidate. It is unknown if membership in specific student pharmacy organizations or types of leadership roles within these organizations are preferred by residency program directors (RPDs). The purpose of the study was to determine preference and importance of specific pharmacy student professional organization membership and leadership involvement when selecting residency candidates for an interview by RPDs. METHODS: A descriptive study was conducted using an online survey. Pharmacy RPDs with involvement in reviewing applicants for interviews were included. RPDs ranked the importance and preference of specific student professional organization membership, breadth versus depth of involvement, and leadership position held on selecting candidates for an interview. RESULTS: The survey was sent to 2084 RPDs. A total of 232 respondents met inclusion criteria and completed the survey. The majority (95.5%) of RPDs reported student membership as important, while 28.6% had preference for a specific organization. A total of 56.3% of RPDs reported student leadership as "very important" and 76.1% preferred depth over breadth of involvement. A total of 55.6% of RPDs preferred applicants with a high-level leadership position. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacy student professional organization membership is important to RPDs when selecting residency candidates for an interview. The majority of RPDs have no preference for a specific organization, while 28.6% report a preference that affects interview selection. RPDs report leadership as important and place higher importance on depth versus breadth of involvement, with greater preference for a high-level leadership position.

Characterization of clinical knowledge and problem-solving assessments employed in postgraduate year 1 pharmacy residency interviews.

PURPOSE: Attainment of postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) residency positions has become increasingly competitive. Inclusion of clinical knowledge and problem-solving assessments in onsite interviews has increased in recent years. Characterization of these assessments is necessary for applicants to best prepare for interviews and for mentors to provide guidance. METHODS: An online survey was emailed to program directors of PGY1 pharmacy residency programs accredited by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare categorical data. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze nonparametric continuous data. RESULTS: Of the 221 respondents, most identified their programs as based at community (48%) or academic (39%) medical centers. Ninety percent of programs reported inclusion of clinical knowledge and problem-solving assessments in the onsite interview process. The most common assessments included asking clinical questions (70%), development of a SOAP (subjective, objective, assessment, plan) note or care plan (42%), and formal presentations that applicants prepared prior to arrival (39%). Most programs (71%) reported incorporating multiple assessments, with 2 assessments included most commonly (43%). Clinical assessment performance accounted for 10% to 25% of the overall interview score in approximately half of programs. CONCLUSION: During onsite PGY1 residency interviews, applicants must be prepared to participate in at least 1 clinical knowledge and problem-solving assessment, including answering clinical questions, developing a SOAP note or care plan, and/or delivering a presentation. Applicants should expect that these assessments will account for a substantial portion of the interview evaluation.

The effect of grit on postgraduate year-one pharmacy residents' pursuit of additional training.

INTRODUCTION: Although much is known about the perceived motivating factors and barriers to individuals pursuing postgraduate year-one (PGY1) residency training, determinants for pursuit of further training after PGY1 are unclear. METHODS: Residents at accredited programs were surveyed regarding grit, residency program and resident characteristics, and pursuit of additional post-graduate training (PGT) intentions and behaviors. Two respondent groups were developed: Pursued Additional PGT and Did Not Pursue Additional PGT. Grit-S scores were compared. A multivariable logistic regression was conducted to determine predictors of additional PGT pursuit. RESULTS: Of 542 participating residents (response rate 14.9%), 332 (61.3%) pursued additional PGT. Residents in the Pursued Additional PGT group scored higher in overall Grit-S (median 3.875, interquartile range (IQR) 3.5-4.25 vs. median 3.75, IQR 3.375-4.125, p = 0.0006) and perseverance of effort (median 4.25, IQR 4-4.5 vs. median 4, IQR 3.75-4.5, p = 0.008) and consistency of interest (median 3.5, IQR 3-4 vs. median 3.5, IQR 2.75-3.75, p = 0.002) domains. Residents who early committed to a PGY2 had higher Grit-S scores than those who did not (median 4, IQR 3.625-4.25 vs. median 3.875, IQR 3.375-4.125, p = 0.012). Following multivariable logistic regression analysis, Grit-S score was the only variable associated with pursuit of additional PGT (odds ratio 17.8, 95% confidence interval 1.59-199.38). CONCLUSIONS: Grit-S scores are associated with PGY1 resident decisions to pursue further PGT and to early commit to PGY2 programs.

Evaluation of pharmacy resident perceived impact of natural disaster on stress during pharmacy residency training.

INTRODUCTION: Natural disasters present unique challenges for healthcare training programs. Limited literature has been published regarding the impact of natural disasters on pharmacy residency training. The objective of this study was to determine the degree of perceived impact natural disasters have on pharmacy resident stress and which factors contribute to any perceived change in stress. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted via a survey distributed to pharmacy residents whose program was located in an area potentially affected by natural disaster in the first six months of the 2017-2018 resident year. A modified Likert scale utilizing a 10-point scale was used to assess resident stress. Potential sources of stress were assessed via multiple-choice questions. The primary outcome was the degree of change in resident perceived stress compared to baseline during and after the natural disaster. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-nine pharmacy residents completed the survey. Stress increased from baseline during the natural disaster and remained elevated after compared to baseline. Main sources of stress were increased residency workload, natural disaster preparation and recovery, and concerns regarding friends and family. Half of residents reported their residency program did not have an established natural disaster policy in place. CONCLUSIONS: Improved planning and communication regarding workload expectations may minimize stress among residents balancing increased personal responsibilities during times of natural disaster.

The role of clinical pharmacist trainees in medication reconciliation process at hospital admission.

Background Medication discrepancies are a common occurrence following hospital admission and carry the potential for causing harm. However, little is known about the prevalence and potential risk factors involved in medication discrepancies in China. Objective To determine the frequency of medication discrepancies and the associated risk factors and evaluate the potential harmsof errors prevented by pharmacist trainees performing medication reconciliation process. Setting A tertiary hospital in Shanxi, China. Method Medication reconciliation was conducted at admission to four clinical departments including cardiology, nephrology, endocrinology and pneumology department between 2019 Feb 1st and 2019 Aug 31st by clinical pharmacist trainees. All unintentional medication discrepancies were presented to the expert panel to evaluate. Associations between unintentional medication discrepancies and various factors were examined. Main outcome measure The primary outcome was the prevalence of unintentional medication discrepancies as well as the associated risk factors. Results Overall, 331 patients were included (mean age 59.7 ± 15.2 years; 176 men). The reconciliation process identified 511 drug discrepancies, 98 of which were unintentional medication discrepancies; these occurred in 74 patients. The most common unintentional medication discrepancies type was omission (40.8%), followed by incorrect dose (25.5%), and 73.5% could have caused patients moderate to significant harm and complications. 5 or more drugs and 2 or more chronic diseases at admission associated with unintentional medication discrepancies in a logistic regression analysis. Conclusion Medication reconciliation performed by pharmacist trainees upon admission can reduce unintentional medication discrepancies. Patients taking 5 or more drugs and experiencing more than two chronic diseases were found to be particularly at risk.

Effect of a multimodal multidisciplinary training program on pharmacy residents' knowledge and confidence toward research and biostatistics.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal method to increase pharmacy resident knowledge and confidence toward research remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the impact of a structured curriculum on pharmacy residents' knowledge, confidence and attitude toward biostatistics and research. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter study included pharmacy residents from 2016 to 2017. Residents underwent research training with (1) 60-hours of online modules delivered by multidisciplinary senior faculty (MD, PhD), (2) a 2-day interactive workshop delivered by experienced pharmacy researchers and (3) a mentored longitudinal research experience. Fifteen residents were invited to complete a questionnaire at baseline and again before graduation to measure knowledge, confidence and attitudes about research. Residents were followed for one additional year to measure peer-reviewed publications. RESULTS: Eleven (73%) residents provided complete responses to ≥1survey domain. At baseline, 27% of respondents reported being at least somewhat confident about their biostatistics and research skills (a favorable response for ≥5 of the 9 confidence items). At follow-up, 91% self-reported confidence. Self-reported familiarity with statistical terminology (a score of 4 or 5) increased from 19% at baseline to 82% at follow-up. The mean correct score on the knowledge items at baseline was 15 ±â€¯2.5 (total possible 28) and increased to 20 ±â€¯2.7 after training. By one year after graduation, 53% of residents published at least 1 peer-reviewed manuscript and 20 peer-reviewed publications as first or co-author with a median journal impact factor of 3.16 (IQR: 2.61-4.59). CONCLUSION: This study provides a framework for sustainable, multidisciplinary, multimodal research education that increased confidence and knowledge among pharmacy residents and resulted in tangible contributions to the scientific literature. Future studies should explore long-term knowledge gained and publications.

Curricular Exposure to Postgraduate Residency Training Through an Introductory Pharmacy Practice Experience.

Objective. To evaluate the impact of a residency-focused introductory pharmacy practice experience (IPPE) on student perceived knowledge of and attitudes toward postgraduate residency training. Methods. Second- and third-year student pharmacists completed a required four-hour experience at a residency training site. Students completed a five-item survey before and after the experience, indicating their perceived knowledge of residency training components as well as their own postgraduate plans. Students also submitted a written reflection following the experience. Paired t tests were used to compare pre- and post-survey responses. Qualitative analysis was completed to identify common themes in student reflections and code for positive, neutral, or negative student experience. Results. A total of 276 students completed the Introduction to Postgraduate Residency Training IPPE in summer 2016. Post-experience survey responses indicated a significant increase in students' perceived knowledge of residency programs; however, plans to pursue residency training did not significantly change after completing the experience. Twenty-five independent themes were identified in reading student reflections, with the most common theme (included in 55% of reflections) being that the experience "clarified resident day-to-day responsibilities." The majority (95%) of students perceived the experience as valuable. Conclusion. A residency-focused IPPE increased student pharmacists' perceptions of knowledge about postgraduate residency training and was viewed by students as a beneficial experience.

Perceptions of the two-phase pharmacy residency match process.

PURPOSE: To evaluate residency applicant (RA) and residency program director (RPD) perceptions of Phase II of the Match process since its inception in 2016. METHODS: An online survey was issued to all Match-registered RAs and RPDs for the 2016, 2017, and 2018 Match periods. Study participant demographics, participant designation (RA or RPD), the year(s) and Phase(s) of the Match participated in were measured using categorical ranges, and overall perceptions of the Match process since Phase II of the Match was implemented were captured with 5-point Likert scales. RESULTS: A total of 2,599 individuals (RA and RPD) completed the survey for an overall survey response rate of 12.6%. The majority of RAs were female (73.2%), under the age of 30 (87.4%), Caucasian (67.4%), and recently graduated (90.9% graduated between 2016 and 2018). Most RAs participated in the 2018 Match period (61%), and overall 82% successfully matched to a residency position. RA perceptions relating to process cost-effectiveness and perceived fairness to all applicants differed significantly from RPD perceptions (2.23 versus 3.71 and 2.80 versus 3.67, respectively; p < 0.001 for each). There were no differences between RA and RPD perceptions related to the submission/review process. CONCLUSION: The Phase II of the Match process has demonstrated improved organization and satisfaction from the RPD perspective compared to the previous process. RAs have identified several areas for improvement in the process. It is imperative that efforts are made to continue expanding program and position offerings as much as possible.

High-fidelity simulation increases pharmacy resident perceived competence during medical emergencies.

INTRODUCTION: Our objective was to assess postgraduate year one (PGY1) pharmacy resident perceived competence during medical emergencies before and after implementation of a longitudinal simulation training curriculum. METHODS: At the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) Medical Center, PGY1 pharmacy residents serve as primary code team responders for code blue, code sepsis, and code stroke, among other medical emergencies. In 2015, the UCSF Residency Training Program implemented a longitudinal simulation curriculum for PGY1 pharmacy residents. Throughout the residency year, residents participated in four simulation lab sessions that addressed various medical emergencies. To assess the impact that the simulation curriculum had on resident perceived competence during medical emergencies, a 19-question survey (13 clinical questions and six control questions) was distributed to the residents at the end of the residency year. Resident responses from the 2015 to 2016 and 2016 to 2017 surveys were compared to a control residency class from 2014 to 2015 who did not undergo the simulation curriculum. RESULTS: Simulation-trained PGY1 pharmacy residents reported significantly greater perceived competence in five of the twelve medical emergency scenarios (acute coronary syndromes, symptomatic bradycardia, supraventricular tachycardia, ventricular tachycardia, and cardiac arrest) as compared to non-simulation-trained controls. In addition, the PGY1 pharmacy residents felt that their performance as a clinical pharmacist would significantly improve as a result of the simulation curriculum. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporation of a longitudinal simulation curriculum into PGY1 pharmacy resident training can positively impact resident self-reported competence when performing essential pharmacist functions during medical emergencies.